Celadon field tool

AI Opportunity / Build–No-Build Scorecard

Use this worksheet to compare candidate opportunities before choosing a vendor or funding implementation. Score each dimension from 0 to 4, then document any override.

Download PDF →

Business value

How directly does the opportunity change revenue, cost, risk, capacity, or service?

0: interesting only
2: useful but indirect
4: material, measurable outcome

Strategic differentiation

Does better performance create an advantage specific to how the organization competes or serves?

0: commodity task
2: operational advantage
4: customer or market differentiation

Proprietary context

How much does success depend on organization-specific knowledge, rules, data, or integrations?

0: generic input
2: some internal context
4: proprietary context is the value

Control requirement

How specific are the permissions, evaluation, residency, audit, or failure-handling needs?

0: standard terms fit
2: configuration needed
4: custom control is essential

Organizational readiness

Is there an owner, usable source material, an evaluation set, and capacity to operate the result?

0: none are in place
2: gaps are bounded
4: owner and evidence are ready

0–6: buy or change the process
The need is generic, or readiness is too low to operate a custom system responsibly.
7–13: assemble
Own workflow, evaluation, and integration while buying commodity platform capabilities.
14–20: investigate a build
Custom ownership may be justified, subject to a costed operating plan and explicit failure conditions.

Override: Score ______   Recommended path ____________________   Owner ____________________   Date __________
Reason for any override: ____________________________________________________________________________

This is a discussion tool, not an automated investment decision. A high opportunity score does not cancel a low readiness score. Celadon uses a more detailed version during an AI Decision Sprint.